Overall, I think the referees got both incidents right. Trossard’s actions were clearly a delay in the restart of play, while Doku’s actions were more of a misunderstanding of where the free kick should be taken. It’s important for players to understand and follow the rules to ensure fair play on the field.
DERMOT SAYS: It was a goal. It was a good goal. It’s a massive difference. The ref had a clear view and got it right. The goal should stand.
WARNOCK SAYS: The ball was clearly over the line. There’s no excuse for not giving that goal. It’s a big call and he’s got it wrong.
SMITH SAYS: It’s a tough one for the ref, but the technology is there to help make these decisions. It’s a goal, simple as that.
The rule is if a player is impeded, they should make the referee aware, and the referee should take action. Ederson is impeded, but he doesn’t make the referee aware of it. It’s a matter of interpretation, but it’s not a foul.
But sometimes the angle can make a big difference in how a tackle is perceived. It’s a tough call for the referee and the fourth official to make in the heat of the moment.